Falta de adherencia a ticagrelor frente a clopidogrel y riesgo de eventos en pacientes con SCA. Resultados del registro CREA-ARIAM / Nonadherence to ticagrelor versus clopidogrel and clinical outcomes in patients with ACS. Results from the CREA-ARIAM registry

Introduction and objectives Prior studies have not determined whether the effect of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) cessation on the subsequent risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) varies by the choice of P2Y12-inhibitor after acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods We performed a prespecified subanalysis of a multicenter, prospective registry of ACS patients discharged on ticagrelor or clopidogrel between 2015 and2019. Nonadherence to DAPT was categorized as physician-guided discontinuation and disruption due to adverse effects, nonadherence, or bleeding. The association between DAPT cessation and 1-year MACE was analyzed using multivariate time-updated Cox models with inverse probability of censoring weighted estimators. Results Out of 2180 patients, 174 (8.3%) prematurely discontinued DAPT (physician-guided, n=126; disruption, n=48). Nonadherent patients were older and had more comorbidities than those on DAPT. Compared with physician-guided discontinuation, disruption occurred earlier after discharge and was more frequent with ticagrelor than with clopidogrel. In time-varying analysis, DAPT cessation was associated with an increased risk of MACE (adjusted HR, 1.32, 95%CI, 1.10-1.76), largely driven by disruption (adjusted HR, 1.47, 95%CI, 1.22-1.73). There was an exponential increase in MACE risk after DAPT cessation within 90 days after ACS, especially after disruption of ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel (Pinteraction<.001). After adjustment for DAPT duration, this interaction was not statistically significant on the additive scale (relative excess risk due to interaction 0.12, 95%CI,−0.99-1.24). Conclusions In this all-comers registry, 1 in 12 patients prematurely discontinued DAPT within 1 year after ACS. Compared with physician-recommended discontinuation, disruption resulted in a significantly higher risk of MACE. After adjustment for DAPT duration, this association was not moderated by the choice of P2Y12-inhibitor (AU)

Introducción y objetivos Una baja adherencia al tratamiento antiagregante plaquetario doble (TAPD) condiciona peor pronóstico tras un síndrome coronario agudo (SCA). Se analizó si el riesgo de eventos adversos cardiovasculares mayores (MACE) tras la interrupción prematura del TAPD varía según el inhibidor del P2Y12. Métodos Análisis preespecificado de pacientes con SCA tratados con ticagrelor o clopidogrel entre 2015 y 2019 dentro de un registro prospectivo multicéntrico. Se categorizó la suspensión prematura como indicada por el médico o como interrupción por hemorragia, efectos secundarios o incumplimiento del paciente. La asociación entre la suspensión del TAPD y los MACE se analizó mediante modelos multivariantes de Cox dependientes del tiempo, con estimadores robustos ponderados por probabilidad inversa de censura. Resultados De 2.180 pacientes, 174 (8,3%) suspendieron el TAPD precozmente (126 por indicación médica y 48 por disrupción). Los pacientes incumplidores tenían más edad y más comorbilidad que los adherentes. Frente a la suspensión indicada por el médico, la disrupción del TAPD fue más precoz y frecuente con el ticagrelor que con el clopidogrel. La suspensión del TAPD condicionó mayor riesgo de MACE (HRajustada=1,32; IC95%, 1,10-1,76), principalmente en caso de la disrupción (HRajustada=1,47; IC95%, 1,22-1,73). Este riesgo aumentó exponencialmente en los 90 días posteriores al SCA y fue más evidente con ticagrelor (pinteracción<0,001). Tras considerar la duración del TAPD, esta interacción no resultó significativa en la escala aditiva (exceso de riesgo debido a interacción=0,12; IC95%, –0,99 a 1,24)(AU)

Nonadherence to ticagrelor versus clopidogrel and clinical outcomes in patients with ACS. Results from the CREA-ARIAM registry.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Prior studies have not determined whether the effect of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) cessation on the subsequent risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) varies by the choice of P2Y12-inhibitor after acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS: We performed a prespecified subanalysis of a multicenter, prospective registry of ACS patients discharged on ticagrelor or clopidogrel between 2015 and2019. Nonadherence to DAPT was categorized as physician-guided discontinuation and disruption due to adverse effects, nonadherence, or bleeding. The association between DAPT cessation and 1-year MACE was analyzed using multivariate time-updated Cox models with inverse probability of censoring weighted estimators. RESULTS: Out of 2180 patients, 174 (8.3%) prematurely discontinued DAPT (physician-guided, n=126; disruption, n=48). Nonadherent patients were older and had more comorbidities than those on DAPT. Compared with physician-guided discontinuation, disruption occurred earlier after discharge and was more frequent with ticagrelor than with clopidogrel. In time-varying analysis, DAPT cessation was associated with an increased risk of MACE (adjusted HR, 1.32, 95%CI, 1.10-1.76), largely driven by disruption (adjusted HR, 1.47, 95%CI, 1.22-1.73). There was an exponential increase in MACE risk after DAPT cessation within 90 days after ACS, especially after disruption of ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel (Pinteraction<.001). After adjustment for DAPT duration, this interaction was not statistically significant on the additive scale (relative excess risk due to interaction 0.12, 95%CI,-0.99-1.24). CONCLUSIONS: In this all-comers registry, 1 in 12 patients prematurely discontinued DAPT within 1 year after ACS. Compared with physician-recommended discontinuation, disruption resulted in a significantly higher risk of MACE. After adjustment for DAPT duration, this association was not moderated by the choice of P2Y12-inhibitor. Clinical trial registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT02500290).

Prognostic implication of early ventricular fibrillation among patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze the prognosis of patients presenting early ventricular fibrillation (VF) in the setting of ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among patients included in the ARIAM (Análisis del Retraso en el Infarto Agudo de Miocardio) registry with the diagnosis of STEMI, those who received primary revascularization and were admitted in the first 12 h were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: From January 2007 to January 2012, 8340 patients were included in the STEMI cohort and 680 (8.2%) of them presented with VF before admission to the ICU (VF). This group comprised younger patients with fewer comorbidities. They received more often primary angioplasty (33.7 vs. 24.9%; P<0.001), had more prevalence of Killip class greater than or equal to 2 at admission (37.5 vs. 17.8%; P<0.001), and suffered more often cardiogenic shock (18.5 vs. 5.9%, P<0.001). By logistic regression analysis, VF was associated with a greater in-hospital mortality [odds rate (OR): 2.08, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.57-2.81, P<0.001]. After a propensity score matching process, VF was associated with in-hospital mortality (OR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.05-2.25, P=0.028). However, when analyzing patients treated by primary angioplasty, the mortality was not significantly related to VF (OR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.45-1.61, P=0.628). CONCLUSION: Our results show that VF before ICU admission was an independent predictor of in-hospital outcome in a cohort of patients in whom fibrinolysis was the most used revascularization therapy. However, this prognostic value was not found in patients treated with primary angioplasty.

Prognostic impact of clopidogrel pretreatment in patients with acute coronary syndrome managed invasively.

Pretreatment with antiP2Y12 agents before angiography in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is associated with a reduction in thrombotic events. However, recent evidences have questioned the benefits of upstream antiP2Y12, reporting a higher incidence of bleeding. We analyzed the prognostic impact of clopidogrel pretreatment in a large cohort of invasively managed patients with ACS. In hospital, safety and efficacy of clopidogrel pretreatment were retrospectively analyzed in patients included in the ARIAM-Andalucía Registry (Analysis of Delay in Acute Myocardial Infarction). Propensity score and inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis were performed to control treatment selection bias. Results were stratified by ACS type. Sensitivity analyses were used to explore stability of the overall treatment effect. Of 9,621 patients managed invasively, 69% received clopidogrel before coronary angiography. In the ST-elevation myocardial infarction group, pretreatment was associated with a significant reduction in reinfarction (odds ratio 0.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27 to 0.96; p = 0.027), stent thrombosis (odds ratio 0.15, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.38; p <0.0001), and mortality (odds ratio 0.67, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.94; p = 0.020), with an increase in minor bleeding but remained as a net clinical benefit strategy. Those benefits were not present in patients without ST elevation (non-ST elevation ACS). The weighting and propensity analysis confirmed the same results. An interaction between pretreatment duration and bleeding was observed. In conclusion, pretreatment with clopidogrel reduced the occurrence of death and thrombotic outcomes at the cost of minor bleeding. Those benefits exclusively affected ST-elevation myocardial infarction cases. The potential benefit of routine upstream pretreatment in patients with non-ST-elevation ACS should be reappraised at the present.